Login | Create New Account | Facebook | Twitter
Homes | Jobs | Wheels | Worship | IShopTheTri | Move To Kingsport | Kingsport Chamber of Commerce
BLOUNTVILLE — Voter fraud has occurred in Sullivan County for years, Sullivan County Administrator of Elections Jason Booher said Tuesday.
Booher said information given to him by state election officials indicates about 100 felons fraudulently registered, are registered still, and voted in the county — some going back as far as the early 1960s.
Booher said he wants the Sullivan County Election Commission to ask Sullivan County District Attorney Greeley Wells to prosecute the individuals for fraudulently registering to vote, and therefore fraudulently voting — in cases that have not passed the four-year statute of limitations.
Booher said fraudulently registering and fraudulently voting each carry their own felony charges.
Booher said work by the Tennessee Election Coordinator’s Office has spurred a statewide, county-by-county effort to identify convicted felons who should not be on voting rolls.
Under Tennessee law, convicted felons lose their voting rights.
Those rights can be restored under certain circumstances and procedures.
State code has changed over the years so a felony conviction during certain time frames and for certain crimes has carried different rules on whether or not a convicted felon’s voting rights were permanently revoked or could be restored through the state’s restoration process.
During a meeting Tuesday of the Sullivan County Election Commission, Booher said his office has been looking at lists provided by the Tennessee Election Coordinator’s Office — and it appears about 100 convicted felons have fraudulently registered and fraudulently voted in Sullivan County.
The Times-News later asked Booher if he or his staff had cross-checked the names in question to see if any of them have in fact had their voting rights restored.
“We’re looking at that,” Booher said. “That’s why I didn’t want to give you an exact number.”
Booher said he classifies the questionable registrations into several categories, including:
•One — people who were already registered to vote when they were convicted of a felony — and who have not voted since that conviction.
•Two — people who were already registered to vote when they were convicted of a felony — and they have voted since that conviction.
•Three — people who were not registered prior to being convicted of a felony, and they registered after the conviction — by falsifying answers on their voter registration application — and they have since voted.
“We’ve looked at everyone in categories one through three,” Booher said. “The list we received from the state identifies a little over 200 people. Some of those people ... not everything matches up. (In) categories one, two and three, their names, Social Security numbers and dates of birth are all exact matches.”
Those account for approximately 120 to 130 people, Booher said.
“Now, not every single one of those individuals voted after their conviction,” Booher said. “So some of those people did not do anything illegal. But I’ve already identified several ... I’ve not dotted the i’s and crossed the t’s on everything — but that’s something we will do before we proceed — that registered to vote fraudulently and voted fraudulently.”
Booher told the local Election Commission he’d provide them with a list of names to take to the district attorney’s office for potential prosecution next month.
“We’ll present the names and the information to Greeley on the people that broke the law,” Booher told the Times-News. “And there are two categories of people who broke the law. Those that were registered to vote and convicted of a felony after the fact. That category of people ... most likely they didn’t realize ... the judge didn’t tell them they lost their voting rights. And the burden is somewhat on this office, too, to get the information from the (circuit court) clerk’s office. And we get that on a daily basis, almost, or at least a weekly basis, we get all the judgments from Sullivan County. Any judgments from any other counties, that county is supposed to look and see in the state system if that person is registered to vote in any other county, and if so, they forward us that information so we can cancel them.”
Those people, Booher said, just “slipped through the cracks.”
“For some reason we didn’t get the notification,” Booher said.
The local Election Commission, Booher said, will include those names in a list it will present to the district attorney’s office to let Wells know “they technically violated the law, but they may have done so unknowingly and innocently.”
Those in the third category, however, are people who “consciously falsified their information and knowingly broke the law,” Booher said — and for most of those people, he will “recommend and highly encourage” Wells to seek indictments.
Booher said elsewhere in the state, Lauderdale County already has gotten nine indictments in a similar effort — working off the same list Booher received from the Tennessee Coordinator of Elections Office.
That office, Booher said, recently took a list of convicted felons provided by the Tennessee Department of Corrections and matched it against voter rolls statewide.
“If there was a hit, or a match, they notified us,” Booher said.
Booher said he’s not sure how often the state has provided such lists in the past, but he was told it “will be a quarterly thing.”
Booher said one man on the list, now 82 years old, registered in 1963 — but 90 percent or more of the voters in question registered in the past 10 years.
As far as the 82-year-old, he last voted in November 2000, Booher said, “so there’s nothing we can do about that, except cancel him and tell him if he wants to vote ... he’ll have to have his rights restored.”
“If we did receive this information in the past — and I believe we did — I don’t know that it was really a priority in the past,” Booher said. “I’m not saying that to try and throw anybody under the bus at all. I’m just saying it wasn’t something that was taken as a priority and maybe not processed fully and full attention given to it. This person may have been on one of these reports for several years and just really never done anything about. But we’re doing something about it now.”
Booher said he hasn’t seen any patterns so far “as far as any conspiracy or anything. But I’m not saying that there isn’t.”
“In my opinion if we don’t have a pure election and do everything we possibly can to ensure that we have a pure election, that our rolls are pure, and that everybody on the registered voter rolls is someone that’s legally registered to vote, then everything our democracy is founded on ... this is the foundation of it, and if you don’t keep the foundation of it built up, then everything else crumbles.”
To comment, you must register.
Comments are the sole responsibility of the registered user participating in online discussions. You agree not to post comments off topic, abusive, obscene, defamatory, vulgar, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned.
Diffident, I hope the masses heed your call. If you don't know Jason Booher any more than "he's republican", then you have no idea who this guy really is. This is yet another prodigal "son" of Ramsey and Mumpower, and everyone knows the extent those two will reach to get their way, no matter what "party" you represent.
I've had a few interactions with this guy over the years, and "this guy has class" wouldn't describe any of them.
The risk to legitimate elections is not so much having a couple hundred illegally registered voters, but giving one party the responsibility in purging the rolls. When the pubbies did this in 2000 and again to some extent in 2004 in both Ohio and Florida, many older, minority, registered Democrats had no idea they had been purged from the voting rolls until the got to the polls. By that time it was too late, which was exactly the intention. Republicans then claimed mistakes were made during a "routine" purge of deceased and felonious voters. So be wary and make sure you're registered in time to correct any "purging" by the deceitful republicans.
At least this Booher chap seems to be trying to uphold the law. That's more than I can say for some law enforcers that cash the paycheck but don't do the job.
"That's the way it works."
No, thats not how it works, you dim bulb. It works that was ONLY if the person defines policy.
When the presidency changes party hands, the cabinet is rightfully dismissed based of party affiliation because they ARE policy people. Their job is to execute policy of the president.
It is still unproven that the Election Administrators that were let go were policy people. If they were not, then removing them based on party affiliation is a violation of their civil rights. Thats what the lawsuit is about.
You are wrongly assuming the practice that is applied to a presidential cabinet is automatically applied in all cases, including this one.
Jane, could you please provide the source that shows felons vote for one party more than another? I would be interested to see who has conducted this study you relied on, as admitting you're a voting felon is a felony.
Kudos to Booher for trying to clean up the voting mess. The vast majority of felons vote for Demwits; thus the reason they've stayed on the rolls and got away with it.
To those of you complaining how he got his job... He got it legally. When the dems get control again, he'll lose it. That's the way it works. You didn't have a problem with it prior to a Republican being appointed. LOL
Mr. Haynes knows how Booher got the job. He simply doesnt care. Jason Booher is going to be a total disaster, beginning with his sleazy and slimy "takeover" of his current position. Ah, but what would you expect from yet another Ron Ramsey and Mumpower crop.
The position is appointed statewide. That's the law made by the democrats years ago, if it was not him it would have been another republican appointed doing the same job.
"Fraud? According to the guy who got his job by violating someone's civil rights?
"
Hows that?
This is a state wide purge of voter rolls many have been found across the state now and I'm sure many more are still to come.
We know that dead people vote in counties across the state. So to get a true fair clean election is not a waste.
Fraud? According to the guy who got his job by violating someone's civil rights?
There are a lot worse things going on in the world than convicted felons voting. Who cares if they voted or not? Leave them alone, take away their voting rights from here on out and stop wasting taxpayers money on something so trivial, give me a break.