your welcome, i am glad i could help

Thanks Mr. Orvis for adding some color to the article and discussion. Finding out that he "hung out" with girls at the track makes me think (but not sure) that the material he was viewing was of female children. Others here wondered what sex his minor targets were also.

The fact that he is married is sad to learn. A relationship, legitimized by God and society, may be ruined here. If not, perhaps his spouse can lead him to seek help for his problem.

Although I have no pity for people afflicted with this penchant, they too, given the right circumstances, can be forgiven, and perhaps lead a meaningful life (not in a position of authority over a child though).

I was shocked that this had even happened because i was on his track team for two years ,last year was one of them. I would of never suspected this from him. But he did like to walk around the track with the girls alot. I can also tell that he is married

Yes Taylor, attempt to "rally the troops". Someone who doesn't prescribe to your thought processes is posting here.

If it doesn't align with your thoughts, ignore it. That's the ticket Taylor.

You've blatantly contradicted yourself quite a few times now, under this and several other posts. While it was a good performance, its obvious now that its nothing more than game. Redux is here to simply twist each story and it's commenters as far as he/she can take it. Dont bite the bait folks.

OK, I agree that showing child pornography is a bit much.

Photos of children in swimsuits or the like would have the same effect.

I am getting sick of you people claiming "fake posts" etc. etc.

Something different must be done other than current tactics to screen applicants.

Redux is fakeposting. There's no way somebody could be serious about showing child pornography at a job interview.

The material utilized for the interview could be nothing more than scantily clad minors, I believe this would have the same effect on these perverts.

You need help REDUX

Absolutely unbelievable. I can’t believe someone “REDUX” would suggest that child pornography be kept and utilized as a job interview technique. First of all, it’s ILLEGAL to possess child pornography….not to mention disgusting. I’ve had a LITTLE experience in this arena, having been in law enforcement for almost 20 years, I have been involved with child pornography cases. Seeing that kind of sick vile thing is extremely hard for someone to deal with. I know quite a few law enforcement officers that have been assigned to work child pornography cases and let me tell you, they say it’s the hardest, most disgusting job they’ve ever had to do.

I agree that there are positions that bear greater scrutiny because of the almost unfettered access they provide to our children, but using child porn as a means of scrutinizing potential employees is not the answer. Maybe a polygraph type of examination process would be a better option. It wouldn’t be fool proof but then again, neither is the child pornography scenario…and the polygraph is a much less disgusting and disturbing option.

Call BS, PS, CS, or whatever you will Pierce.

I propose the use of a plethysmograph in the job application process. Nowhere did I say it was currently employed for such use. My statement was that such a device exists, which it does.

It has been used in criminal investigations, but I must say, in most cases, any evidence gained has been deemed inadmissible.

Merely an attempt on my part to solve the placement of these individuals in a position of authority over their targets; children.

Is that the perp's photograph or a local dentistry advertisement?

The wikipedia article for plethysmograph says nothing about its use in weeding out potential child predators. How is an employer going to keep something like child porn around, and how exactly are they going to perform this test without getting a boatload of lawsuits? I'm gonna have to call BS on that one.

Taylor,

You are starting to get on my nerves with your constant needling.

The word is plethysmograph. Look it up yourself. Try Wikipedia first. If that's too complex for you to understand, let me know.

Lets see some sources, redux. Where are these tests performed? Or was this yet another post with the hopes of garnering some type of response, no matter what it may be?

Yes, as part of an arsenal of tools to weed out these degenerates before they become instructors to children.

This tool is used in some states already and is nothing new.

So potential employers should keep a stash of kiddie porn handy?

These type deviants plant themselves in teacher jobs, librarians, coaches, youth ministers, etc. etc. just to get close to our children.

I propose that during the interview process, each and every candidate be fitted with a device what would read whether or not they get aroused, then put some child porn in front of them.

If the device registers arousal, the interview is over.

Ive not read anything in this article that hints at a sexual preference. He "allegedly" accessed child pornography. His photo should certainly be in this paper.

Well well and some would say gay's are sick deviants . I'm glad they got him and I hope he does very hard time in jail but yeah where's his picture better yet I noticed the lack of his picture and his home address . Could this be maybe because he's not a gay man ?

Why is there no picture of the lowest level of scum with the article? I am sure the parents are not happy that such a person was interacting with their children, how long has he been at the school, where is the rest of the story?