Women's and men's views about their elections tend to be more similar in high-middle, low-middle, and low-income countries. Confidence is lowest overall in high-middle income countries, where more than one in three of either gender trust their election process. Confidence is higher and similar to the global average in low-middle and low-income countries.
Regionally, gender gaps are widest in the Americas and Europe. Women in Europe are among the most confident worldwide in their elections, but at 53%, their confidence trails men's by five percentage points. The gender gap is similarly large in the Americas, but confidence among both genders is lower, at 37% among women and 43% among men. Men's and women's views are similar to each other in other regions.
There are 14 countries where the gender gap in perceived honesty of elections is 10 points or higher. Ten of these are high-income nations, seven of them in Europe. The largest gender gaps worldwide are in Malta, Portugal, France, and Slovenia. In each of these four nations, except Malta, more than half of women are confident in the honesty of elections. In some cases, women are more likely than men to say they don't know or refuse to answer the question. Nonetheless, the overall pattern that emerges is one in which greater confidence in elections nationally often means a greater gender divide in perceptions of their honesty.
Women in "full democracies," as classified in the 2011 Democracy Index compiled by the Economist Intelligence Unit, also tend to be less confident than men in the honesty of their elections, regardless of their overall confidence. Women's confidence is among the highest globally in the Netherlands and Finland, at 80%, but the gender gaps of eight and seven points, respectively, are similar to that in the U.S., where overall confidence in elections is much lower. The U.S. joins Malta, South Korea, and the Czech Republic as the full democracies where less than a majority of women feel confident in the honesty of elections.
There is no clear relationship between the type of democracy a country has or the percentage of women serving in government with women's perceived confidence in elections. The hybrid democracy of Cambodia and the authoritarian democracy of Laos rise to the top in overall confidence, with high confidence among both genders, but perhaps because many people answer positively out of fear. Women in the Netherlands and Finland are the most confident among full democracies, but women remain less confident than men despite holding a roughly four out of ten positions in government. Sweden is another example in which women express a high level of confidence and hold a large percentage of positions in government, but still, women's views trail men's by one of the largest gender gaps in the world.
Despite being perceived as world leaders in many respects, high-income countries and full democracies have for the most part been unable to earn women's faith in elections to the same degree as men's. Women's lower confidence could inhibit their levels of civic engagement, political participation, and desire to seek roles in government, hindering progress toward gender inequality on other levels.
The fact that the gender divide is largest in high-income countries reflects the continuation of a phenomenon Gallup has also documented in terms of women's employment and perceptions of safety. The findings remind leaders that when a society progresses, women's attitudes and behaviors do not necessarily improve to a similar degree as men's. Where both women and men express similarly negative views, leaders could pursue broad-based solutions to increase confidence in elections. In the case where large gender gaps exist, gender-based interventions may be warranted.
Charts, the questions and complete data sets are available at the Gallup Web site.